セクションアウトライン

    •  Sulfate ions (SO42-) are abundant in seawater as salt components. Under an oxidative environment where oxygen is abundant, SO42- is the most stable of the sulfur compounds, so most of the sulfur in seawater exists as SO42-. On the other hand, under a reducing seafloor, an environment is created in which several types of sulfur compounds are present. 

       The oxidation number of sulfur (S) in SO42- is +6. If we add eight electrons (e-) and one hydrogen ion (H+) to this S and remove O, we get hydrogen sulfide ion (HS-) with the oxidation number of S being -2. Conversely, when HS- is present in water, take away 8 electrons from S and do the opposite and you get SO42-. At a certain condition, it is determined whether most of the S exists as SO42- or HS-. At that boundary, SO42- and HS- exist in equal proportions. Let us find the boundary condition (redox potential).

       First, the half-reactions in which SO42- and HS- exchange electrons are described below.


      half-reaction(’)        SO42- + 9H+ + 8e-  =  HS-  + 4H2O


       As explained in the previous course, a redox reaction does not proceed by a single half-reaction. If the reaction is sulfuric acid respiration, it will be combined with the half-reaction of organic matter oxidation (carbon in organic matter releases electrons, carbon in carbon dioxide receives electrons) to form a redox reaction. Which direction the reaction proceeds in, however, depends on the conditions.

       In other words, when HS- and SO42- are mixed, if an electron is passed from another half-reaction to the above half-reaction (④'), the reaction proceeds in the direction of HS- formation, and if another half-reaction takes an electron away from the half-reaction (④'), the reaction proceeds in the direction of SO42- formation.


    •  Now, let us proceed with the calculation.


      The standard Gibbs energy of formation for each substance in the half reaction (④') is noted below, and the total difference between the product form and the original form ⊿Gf0 is obtained.

                                      original form                                      product form

      half reaction(S)         SO42-   +   9H+   +   8e-      =      HS-   +     4H2O    

      Gf0 (kJ/mol)      -744.5      0                12.08        237.2            

       

      Total difference between the standard Gibbs energy of formation of the substance in its original and product forms.:⊿Gf0 

      Gf0 (J) = 12.08×103 + 4(237.2×103) (744.5 ×103) = 192220


      From the condition that the energies (including electrons) of the original and the product forms are equal, we obtain the standard electrode potential E0.

      E0 = -⊿Gf0 /(nF) = (192220) / (896485) =  0.249 (V)(≒0.25

       

      Applying Nernst equation,

      E = 0.25 0.003208Ln {([HS][H2O]4) / ([SO42-][H+]9)}

       

      As a rule of physical chemistry, let [H2O] = 1.

       

      E = 0.25 + 0.003208Ln([SO42-] / [HS]) + 0.0032089Ln [H+]

        = 0.25 + 0.003208Ln([SO42-] / [HS]) 0.0032089Log[H+] / Log(e)

       = 0.25 + 0.003208Ln([SO42-] / [HS]) 0.06648×pH

       

      Hydrogen ion concentration rewritten in pH( pH = -Log10[H+] )


      If we attach a boundary condition ([SO42-] / [HS-]=1) where SO42- and HS- are present in the same ratio, E becomes

       

      E = 0.25 0.06648×pH.                    (equation 1)


      For example, if we substitute seawater pH = 8, the boundary between the greater and lesser abundance ratios of [SO42-] and [HS-] is E = -0.28 (V).

       

      The ratio of [SO42-] >> [HS-] is reached when the redox potential of the ambient water is E >-0.28 (V),

      the ratio of [SO42-] << [HS-] is reached when the redox potential of the ambient water is E <-0.28 (V).


       

      It is important to note that this is the boundary condition obtained from the thermodynamic constant, and it has been confirmed that sulfate reduction (HS- generation) occurs at E<-0.1 (V) in actual sediments. Due to the action of organisms (local reducing environment within the organisms and enzymes), sulfate reduction occurs in a more oxidizing environment than the boundary conditions in the thermodynamic calculations. The rate of sulfate reduction is also believed to be much faster due to microbial action.