Now, let us proceed with the calculation.
The standard Gibbs energy of formation for each substance in the half reaction (④') is noted below, and the total difference between the product form and the original form ⊿Gf0 is obtained.
original form product form
half reaction(S) SO42-
+ 9H+ + 8e- = HS- + 4H2O
Gf0 (kJ/mol) -744.5 0 12.08 -237.2
Total difference between the standard Gibbs energy of formation of the substance in its original and product forms.:⊿Gf0
⊿Gf0 (J)
= 12.08×103 + 4(-237.2×103) - (-744.5 ×103) = -192220
From the condition that the energies (including electrons) of the original and the product forms are equal, we obtain the standard electrode potential E0.
E0 = -⊿Gf0 /(n・F) = -(-192220) / (8・96485) = 0.249 (V)(≒0.25)
Applying Nernst equation,
E = 0.25 - 0.003208・Ln {([HS-][H2O]4)
/ ([SO42-][H+]9)}
As a rule of physical chemistry, let [H2O] = 1.
E = 0.25 + 0.003208・Ln([SO42-]
/ [HS-]) + 0.003208・9・Ln [H+]
= 0.25 +
0.003208・Ln([SO42-]
/ [HS-]) +
0.003208・9・Log[H+] /
Log(e)
= 0.25 + 0.003208・Ln([SO42-]
/ [HS-]) - 0.06648×pH
Hydrogen ion concentration rewritten in pH( pH = -Log10[H+] )
If we attach a boundary condition ([SO42-] / [HS-]=1) where SO42- and HS- are present in the same ratio, E becomes
E = 0.25 - 0.06648×pH. (equation 1)
For example, if we substitute seawater pH = 8, the boundary between the greater and lesser abundance ratios of [SO42-] and [HS-] is E = -0.28 (V).
The ratio of [SO42-] >> [HS-] is reached when the redox potential of the ambient water is E >-0.28 (V),
the ratio of [SO42-] << [HS-] is reached when the redox potential of the ambient water is E <-0.28 (V).
It is important to note that this is the boundary condition obtained from the thermodynamic constant, and it has been confirmed that sulfate reduction (HS- generation) occurs at E<-0.1 (V) in actual sediments. Due to the action of organisms (local reducing environment within the organisms and enzymes), sulfate reduction occurs in a more oxidizing environment than the boundary conditions in the thermodynamic calculations. The rate of sulfate reduction is also believed to be much faster due to microbial action.