Significant figures (introduction)

โครงสร้างหัวข้อ

• General

  ย่อทั้งหมด ขยายทั้งหมด
  • 

    Japanese URL

• About significant figures and precision
  • About significant figures and precision

     　In environmental analytical chemistry, accuracy control is particularly important. For example, consider the accuracy of CO2 measurements in the atmosphere and seawater. Since the Industrial Revolution, humans have diligently released CO2 into the atmosphere, and the global concentration of atmospheric CO2 has increased from 280 ppm to 380 ppm in less than 100 years. In other words, it increases by 1ppm every year. Expressing this as an annual rate, it is an increase rate of 0.3% yr^-1. This is the global annual average value. If it is near a city, it will be subject to anthropogenic CO2 fluctuations, and if it is close to vegetation, it will be greatly affected by seasonal fluctuations due to photosynthesis and respiration (see the figure below). In order to observe CO2 in places with such strong fluctuations and discuss year-to-year changes, it is necessary to measure it with high precision.

    
    

    

    北緯north latitude　度degree　東経east longitude　南緯southern latitude　二酸化炭素濃度carbon dioxide concentration　北半球の経年変化例Example of secular change in the Northern Hemisphere　南半球の経年変化例Example of secular change in the Southern Hemisphere　年year
    

    （From the Japan Meteorological Agency website）

    
    

    　When measuring CO2 in the atmosphere or seawater at a certain location, the required accuracy is at the ±0.3ppm level. Dividing this by the atmospheric concentration corresponds to ±0.08%.
    
    
    

    (Even though the accuracy of the analyzer itself is higher, we want to ensure a total accuracy of ±0.3ppm from sample collection, analysis, and concentration determination using a calibration curve.)
    
    
    

    　When aiming for such high precision measurements, where are the sources of error? How does that error propagate and affect the results? must be seriously considered. Does the standard sample really guarantee the correct concentration? Accuracy control is necessary from the fundamental point of view.

• significant figures

  　It refers to the number of digits in a number that has a rational basis as a measured value or analytical value, taking into account measurement accuracy, etc.

  　If you write a concentration value in the answer column of an analytical chemistry test using an absurd (no rational basis) number of digits, such as 12.34567636455, you will be rejected immediately. Even if it is written in the experiment report, it is a considerable negative point.

   

  First, familiarize yourself with significant figures.
  

  
  

  • It's easy to get used to and remember, so I'll show you an example.

    
    

    example

    
    

    ①　If you write a number as "1.0", the number of significant digits in this number is 2 digits.

    　　　→　This means that there is an error of 1.0 ±0.05.

          (There is an error in the third digit, so the valid number is 2 digits.)
    
    (The value included in the range of 0.95 ≦ x <1.05)

    ②　If you write a number as "25", the number of significant digits in this number is 2 digits.

    　　　→25 This means that there is an error of ±0.5.

    　　　　(This is a number in the range of 24.5≦x<25.5)

     

    ③　If you write a number as "0.020", the number of significant digits in this number is 2 digits.

    　　　→　This means that there is an error of 0.020 ±0.0005.

    　　　　(This is a number in the range of 0.0195≦x<0.0205)

    ④　If you write a number as "25×10²", the number of significant digits in this number is 2 digits.“

    　　　→　This means that there is an error of 25×10² ±0.5×10².

    　　　　（24.5×10²≦x＜25.5×10²の範囲の数値のことである）

     

    ⑤　If you write a number as "2500", the number of significant digits in this number is 4 digits.

    　　　→　2500 means that it has an error of ±0.5.

    　　　　(This is a number in the range of 2499.5≦x<2500.5)
    

    
    

    
    

    Have you gotten used to it yet?